<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div> </div>
<div class="signature">Hi!</div>
<div class="signature">This might not be the correct forum - but I'm sure the right people are listening.</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">As of this writing, the data sent by onionoo doesn't follow the protocol specification:</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">"Graph history objects", parameter "first" & "last", shall be of format "UTC timestamp", which is a <string>.</div>
<div class="signature">They yet are of type <int>, looking like an epoch timestamp in milliseconds.</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">Evidence - as a result of the "example request" of the onionoo protocol page:</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">
<pre>{"version":"6.2",
"next_major_version_scheduled":"2018-09-03",
"build_revision":"49879eb",
"relays_published":"2018-08-08 08:00:00",
"relays":[
{"fingerprint":"000...","write_history":{"3_months":{"first":1525694400000,"last":1533556800000,"interval":86400,"factor":27.72504778344874,"count":92,"values": ...</pre>
</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">Could someone confirm and fix, or alternatively alter the protocol spec, please?</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">Thanks, Ralph</div></div></body></html>