<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div></div>
<div>Patrick,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I run all of my relays under VMware and I don't have any issues at all.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>How many CPUs do you have in the physical server and how many virtual CPUs do you have assigned to the VM?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>John</div>
<div><br>
On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:19, Patrick DERWAEL <<a href="mailto:patrick@derwael.be">patrick@derwael.be</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><font size="2">Hi guys,<br>
<br>
I'm running a relay in a VM on a physical server which is largely under used<br>
Current advertised bandwidth 26MB, consensus 76500<br>
I'm considering running a second relay (2nd VM) on the very same hardware, but this brings a few questions:<br>
<br>
- is there any issue running it at the same geographical place?<br>
- would the current total BW effectively consumed (26MB) be divided in 2 (i.e. no added value in BW)?<br>
- basically, would it have any significant added value to the network?<br>
<br>
Thanks</font>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<p><font size="2"> </font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>tor-relays mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays@lists.torproject.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays">https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>