<div dir="auto">Again, bits or bytes. I can't believe I'm repeating myself, don't you people read? <div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The ORIGINAL (version 1) Raspberry Pi had a max of 1 MegaBYTE.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">1 MegaBYTE = 8 megaBITS</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Obviously other factors limit performance, but looking at just the maximum network capacity of a Raspberry Pi 1, it could handle 8Mbit/s. </div><br><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 6, 2016 11:16 AM, "Rana" <<a href="mailto:ranaventures@gmail.com">ranaventures@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="quoted-text">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: tor-relays [mailto:<a href="mailto:tor-relays-bounces@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays-bounces@<wbr>lists.torproject.org</a>] On Behalf Of pa011<br>
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 1:24 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays@lists.torproject.<wbr>org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP<br>
<br>
<br>
> I would like to hear about ONE Raspi Tor operator who was allowed by DirAuths (or bwauths or whatever) to come even near 1 mbit/s bandwidth utilization<br>
><br>
<br>
let me tell:<br>
<a href="https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AA44C4BE3C90DCAAC09E5CD26150710AAA80D58B" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlas.torproject.org/#<wbr>details/<wbr>AA44C4BE3C90DCAAC09E5CD2615071<wbr>0AAA80D58B</a><br>
<a href="https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CA9A5D5C4688F04EEC1AF810B0FD348109FA17FB" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlas.torproject.org/#<wbr>details/<wbr>CA9A5D5C4688F04EEC1AF810B0FD34<wbr>8109FA17FB</a><br>
<br>
are sharing the same dynamic IP on a Rasp2 -cut every 24 hours<br>
<br>
day rx | tx | total | avg. rate<br>
------------------------+-----<wbr>--------+-------------+-------<wbr>--------<br>
05.12.2016 27,20 GiB | 28,39 GiB | 55,59 GiB | 5,40 Mbit/s<br>
<br>
<br>
that is slight above 1 Mbit/s :-)<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
</div>----------------------------<br>
<br>
Wow nice bandwidth you are pushing through Paul! You mean two Raspi 2's sharing an Internet connection, each relaying 27 Gbytes per day at 5.4 Mbit/s on the average?? Total 10.8 Mbit/s?? Or 2.7 Mbit/s each?<br>
<br>
Definitely refutes the previously claimed 1 Mbit/s Tor limit on Raspi, and means that Raspi has nothing to do with the ridiculously low utilization of my relay, just as I thought. As a matter of fact this means that whoever is NOT running a relay on a Raspi (or two, or four of them) is wasting money, unless he has a computer lying about with nothing better to do.<br>
<br>
Also, what's the max memory and CPU utilization on your Raspi (I have read somewhere that Tor is only capable of utilizing 2 of the 4 CPU cores), and what kind of Internet connection do you have?<br>
<br>
BTW the $35 Raspi 3 has 33% more CPU power than your Raspi 2 and the same amount of memory.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Rana<br>
</font><div class="elided-text"><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tor-relays mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays@lists.torproject.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.torproject.org/<wbr>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-<wbr>relays</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>