<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div>probably they will at least detect some traffic to porn-sites? but there still is a "can" in the sentence:
"CRSERVERS can suspend or terminate unilaterally this hosting contract immediately and with no Refunds, if the customer
incurs in one or several of the following"
<br />
you should reduce your exit policy and give it a try:
<br />
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment
<br />
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
<br />
<br />
<div>
<div>Am Sonntag, 6. September 2015 06:06 schrieb Patrick O'Doherty <p@trickod.com>:
<br />
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>hey all,
<br />
<br />
I'm looking to host an exit relay in a country with a low node count. I
<br />
came across crservers.com[0] via exotic VPS, and am considering using
<br />
them to host a small exit node to start out.
<br />
<br />
A quick glance at their ToS for VPS services[1] indidicates that their
<br />
policies are pretty strict, but figured it'd be worth asking the list to
<br />
see if anyone had personal experience with them before I rule them out.
<br />
I've also contacted them about this.
<br />
<br />
cheers,
<br />
<br />
p
<br />
<br />
[0] - https://crservers.com
<br />
[1] - https://www.crservers.com/downloads/SHARED-SERVER-CONTRACT.pdf
<br />
<br />
_______________________________________________
<br />
tor-relays mailing list
<br />
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
<br />
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>