<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Thanks all for your replies… this helps. Makes sense why the non-hashed fingerprint isn’t shown. <div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Glad to know I was just misunderstanding the info on Globe/Atlas. I was worried there was something wrong with my node.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-Pat</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jan 19, 2015, at 1:39 AM, Karsten Loesing <<a href="mailto:karsten@torproject.org" class="">karsten@torproject.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><fieldset style="padding-top:10px; border:0px; border: 3px solid #CCC; padding-left: 20px;" class=""><legend style="font-weight:bold" class="">Signed PGP part</legend><div style="padding-left:3px;" class="">On 18/01/15 19:02, Patrick Scharmer wrote:<br class="">> Hi,<br class="">><br class="">> I’ve been running a bridge for over a year and noticed recently<br class="">> that the fingerprint shown in ARM (and that actually works when<br class="">> connecting to the bridge) differs from the fingerprint displayed<br class="">> for my bridge on both Atlas and Globe. Any thoughts on why this<br class="">> would happen and how to fix it? I’m assuming the fingerprint<br class="">> published on Atlas & Globe is the same fingerprint that will be<br class="">> distributed by bridges.torproject, is that correct?<br class=""><br class="">arm displays your bridge's fingerprint, which is also distributed by<br class=""><a href="http://bridges.torproject.org" class="">bridges.torproject.org</a>.<br class=""><br class="">Atlas and Globe show your bridge's *hashed* fingerprint.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span> The reason<br class="">that they're not showing the (non-hashed) fingerprint is that anyone<br class="">could ask the bridge authority for your bridge's current descriptor if<br class="">they had its (non-hashed) fingerprint, and that would reveal your<br class="">bridge's IP address.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span> That's why Atlas and Globe hash your fingerprint.<br class=""><br class="">> Apologies if this is a common question… I’ve only recently joined<br class="">> the mailing list and couldn’t find a way to search the archives<br class="">> other than browsing.<br class=""><br class="">It's a valid question.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span> If you have any ideas how to explain it better<br class="">on Atlas or Globe, please open a ticket.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span> Thanks!<br class=""><br class="">All the best,<br class="">Karsten</div></fieldset><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">tor-relays mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org" class="">tor-relays@lists.torproject.org</a><br class="">https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>