<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>>"I guess the first question should be whether such a relay would be
welcome on the Tor network in the first place? I am aware that
connecting to Tor through a VPN isn't generally recommended, but
what about running a relay through one? Better idea, or a
ridiculously bad one?"<br></div>It isn't a better idea, certainly; but it isn't so bad as to throw it out entirely. Since all non-exit communications are encrypted, there wouldn't be any huge "no-nos" as far as that is concerned.<br><br>However, with an exit node, (some) communications aren't encrypted. It really boils down to whether or not you trust your provider. However, the same can be said with a VPS provider! I would not be concerned about it; please add your relay to the network.<br><br>>"Second, while it would run on a (nearly) dedicated 100mbit
connection, i do not have dedicated equipment. The machine needs to
be taken offline between every 2-4 weeks, for some days at a time.
Frequent OS updates also often require reboots in addition to this
downtime. So much for a stable flag, but more importantly i need to
know if this behavior is undesirable for running middle/exit relays?
If so, would a bridge be better suitable with the tools i have at
hand?"<br></div><br></div>The main reason we strive for stable, rock-solid relays is for connectivity. If you have ever used SSH/IRC via Tor, you know how annoying it is when you get disconnected. This is likely because one of the 3 relays went offline. I would say a machine that goes offline every 2-4 days would be beyond acceptable; but one that goes offline every few hours is ridiculous. Just keep in mind that everytime you shut down your system, you close a lot of folk's connections, and some software wasn't made to handle that without it being a pain in the ass (ie PuTTY; you'll have to retype your password). <br><br></div>You shouldn't have to power off that often. If so, consider reconfiguring your OS or switching your OS to a more stable one; my favorite is FreeBSD, never have to reboot for anything, but I'm not going to start preaching here. <br><br></div>>bridges<br>I have no experience running a bridge, and I don't feel rather comfortable telling you the wrong information. I would perform a few more searches. <br><br></div><br></div>Feel free to reply and I should be able to get back to you in a timely manner. <br><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:43 PM, TT <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tbr66@riseup.net" target="_blank">tbr66@riseup.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I'm thinking of running a relay, and i've a few questions regarding
the requirements and the general setup. So far this is just
planning.<br>
<br>
The hardware would be clean and in my possession, but the connection
would go through a Swedish-based VPN provider because i'm not
interested in running it through my own IP address. The provider
endorses Tor and places no limits whatsoever on the services run
through their connection, has port forwarding and allows exits, so
no issues there. They also have a strict no-logging policy, but
words are cheap so you never know.<br>
<br>
I guess the first question should be whether such a relay would be
welcome on the Tor network in the first place? I am aware that
connecting to Tor through a VPN isn't generally recommended, but
what about running a relay through one? Better idea, or a
ridiculously bad one?<br>
<br>
Second, while it would run on a (nearly) dedicated 100mbit
connection, i do not have dedicated equipment. The machine needs to
be taken offline between every 2-4 weeks, for some days at a time.
Frequent OS updates also often require reboots in addition to this
downtime. So much for a stable flag, but more importantly i need to
know if this behavior is undesirable for running middle/exit relays?
If so, would a bridge be better suitable with the tools i have at
hand?<br>
<br>
Third, regarding running bridges. The Tor Project FAQ states running
your own bridge might improve your own anonymity. I assume this
means you would manually set up your TBB to connect to *your own*
bridge, is this correct? And finally, since the bridge would run on
a separate (VPN) IP address, would this make a difference
(re:anonymity) for better or worse if you connected through it
yourself? I'm likely missing something here because it seems it
would basically be the same as simply connecting to Tor through the
VPN client alone.<br>
<br>
Thanks.
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
tor-relays mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays@lists.torproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays" target="_blank">https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>