<div dir="ltr">Jeremy,<div><br></div><div>Yea I noticed that too.  So, I ended up putting them all on different IP's.  Working well so far.<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Jon</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Jeremy Olexa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jolexa@jolexa.net" target="_blank">jolexa@jolexa.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Jon,<br>
<span class=""><br>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Jon Daniels <<a href="mailto:apexio@gmail.com">apexio@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Recently I turned up nineteen additional nodes on that server and they're<br>
> averaging 60Mbps of overall throughput.  CPU load is still 0.00.<br>
<br>
</span>While I can't speak for the Australian problem, I do want to highlight<br>
that you can only have two TOR processes per IP.<br>
<br>
"Note that running more than two tor processes per IP address will<br>
result in those other nodes not being used on the network. You'll see<br>
the following message in your logs:<br>
<br>
[notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus."<br>
<br>
(source: <a href="https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server" target="_blank">https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server</a> - It probably is<br>
in the spec somewhere but I didn't have the right search term)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-Jeremy<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
tor-relays mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays@lists.torproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays" target="_blank">https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>