<div dir="ltr">OK I've set <font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">MaxAdvertisedBandwidth, but I did set it in the past, with no results ....</span></font><br><br><font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">Anything else beside running multiple relays ?</span></font><br><br><font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">Many many thanks again ! </span></font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-10-11 2:48 GMT-04:00 Matthew Finkel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthew.finkel@gmail.com" target="_blank">matthew.finkel@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:05:24AM -0400, Blaise Gagnon wrote:<br>
> Hi and many thanks for developping this project !<br>
><br>
> I have a dedicated 200Mb (25 MB) fiber optics connection and a dedicated<br>
> quad-core Linux server (64). What is the best setup to get maximum<br>
> bandwidth usage ? I'm still stuck at 46.4Kb measured speed and 3,51MB<br>
> advertised bandwidth. The server has direct connection to the Internet.<br>
><br>
> Fingerprint : 5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>Hi Blaise,<br>
<br>
Thanks for running a relay!<br>
<br>
It looks like you're currently peaking at a little over 2MB (with a<br>
mean of ~1MB)[0][1].<br>
<br>
I also see that the relay is currently hibernating. This will<br>
certainly impact the amount of bandwidth you use. Did you configure<br>
MaxAdvertisedBandwidth?<br>
<br>
Below is what the network knows about your relay (with some irrelevant<br>
details removed).<br>
<br>
$ curl <a href="https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?fingerprint=5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12" target="_blank">https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?fingerprint=5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12</a><br>
{<br>
  "version":"1.1",<br>
  "relays_published":"2014-10-11 05:00:00",<br>
  "relays":[<br>
  {<br>
    "nickname":"QuebecFibe",<br>
    "fingerprint":"5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12",<br>
    [...]<br>
    "last_seen":"2014-10-11 06:00:00",<br>
    "last_changed_address_or_port":"2014-10-07 07:00:00",<br>
    "first_seen":"2014-07-17 17:00:00",<br>
    "running":true,<br>
    "flags":["Fast","Running","V2Dir","Valid"],<br>
    [...]<br>
    "consensus_weight":5950,<br>
    "host_name":"69.159.127.80",<br>
    "last_restarted":"2014-10-08 06:31:26",<br>
    "bandwidth_rate":26214400,<br>
    "bandwidth_burst":26214400,<br>
    "observed_bandwidth":3512594,<br>
    "advertised_bandwidth":3512594,<br>
    "exit_policy":["reject *:*"],<br>
    "exit_policy_summary":{"reject":["1-65535"]},<br>
    [...]<br>
    "advertised_bandwidth_fraction":2.777751E-4,<br>
    "consensus_weight_fraction":2.4263727E-4,<br>
    "guard_probability":0.0,<br>
    "middle_probability":7.2791905E-4,<br>
    "exit_probability":0.0,<br>
    "recommended_version":true,<br>
    "hibernating":true}<br>
  ],<br>
  [...]<br>
]}<br>
<br>
[0] <a href="https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12" target="_blank">https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12</a><br>
[1] <a href="https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12" target="_blank">https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12</a><br>
<span class=""><br>
> Should I run multiple relays on the same machine/IP ?<br>
<br>
</span>You can, and it may help, but there may be a simpler problem that can<br>
be fixed here.<br>
<br>
- Matt<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
tor-relays mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org">tor-relays@lists.torproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays" target="_blank">https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>