Who got kicked off <a href="http://100tb.com">100tb.com</a>?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 PM, grarpamp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com">grarpamp@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">> On the cost side, Cogent and Hurricane Electric both sell 100 meg in<br>
> the $400 to $500 range in top tier data centers. You can easily get<br>
> Gigabit for $1500 from them (unmetered).<br>
<br>
</div>Didn't know Cogent had gone that low yet, thx. HE is more a<br>
provider of mixed services (colo/host/transit) than traditional<br>
pipe though.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> But the DMCA notices go to the ARIN contact for the block. If you<br>
> just get service, you may not be set as the "owner" (according to<br>
> ARIN) of the block.<br>
<br>
</div>Sure. I guess my mention of being an ISP should have said it was<br>
for purposes of going naturally alongside direct allocation.<br>
In a former life, I did send notices to upstream pipe as needed.<br>
ie: If there was an issue requiring it... traceroute, lookup and mail.<br>
So even an independant ISP, in their own room, buying circuit from<br>
L3/etc, could have a ticket lodged at L3. That was also the point about<br>
structuring. Companies layer and silo things as suits them.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> I've been ignoring DMCA notices for 10 years<br>
<br>
</div>As would many rightly do, laws of other countries don't apply. Business<br>
seeks to minimize cost, ignoring saves cost with minimal risk.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Really, though, there's only 86 days of IPv4 allocation left (see HE's<br>
> status page or gadget). The time for you to set up a company, get raw<br>
> bandwidth and speak BGP with your peers is likely come and gone. TOR<br>
> needs to think about IPv6.<br>
<br>
</div>Yep, I left that part out of my prior note. That's a big problem as far as<br>
opening up shop as a new ISP. For this or any other purpose. Especially<br>
if you want to keep it private [held and funded] with organic growth... no<br>
time left for that. Save for givebacks and if IANA/etc brokers private swaps,<br>
direct v4 allocation simply won't exist, everything will be SWIP.<br>
<br>
The v6 net, current OS's, DNS are all ready. A fair number of popular apps,<br>
certainly opensource ones, do v6. So yes, Tor needs to become v6 capable.<br>
<br>
The v4 game may be played out. But given that true global v6 adoption vs<br>
NAT everywhere has what maybe a 50/50 chance?... early v6 ISP's could<br>
make a killing. Maybe we'll be among them :)<br>
<br>
Oh well, kindof off topic. Cheers.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>