Thanks a lot Roger.<br><br>Michael<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/5/23 Roger Dingledine <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arma@mit.edu">arma@mit.edu</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 01:09:30PM -0400, Michael Gomboc wrote:<br>
> *>i compared <a href="http://torstatus.kgprog.com/" target="_blank">http://torstatus.kgprog.com/</a> and<br>
> ><a href="http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/" target="_blank">http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/</a> <<a href="http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/" target="_blank">http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/</a>> and while<br>
<div class="im">> kgprog shows both our relays<br>
> >with a bandwith around "72" while blutmagie shows "0".<br>
> *<br>
> <a href="http://kgprog.com" target="_blank">kgprog.com</a> is showing me all the time the double of the bandwidth that<br>
> <a href="http://blutmagie.de" target="_blank">blutmagie.de</a> does.<br>
> For example now my average bandwidth at blutmagie is 77kb/s and at kgprog<br>
> 156kb/s.<br>
><br>
> But if I understand that right then blumagie shows the routing bandwidth and<br>
> kgprog shows the total bandwidth<br>
> given to TOR, so incoming plus outgoing.<br>
><br>
> Please somebody correct me if I'm wrong!<br>
<br>
</div>No, blutmagie is showing you the actual average bytes per second that<br>
your relay is handling. Whereas kgprog is showing you the number that's<br>
advertised in the consensus for you, which is what clients use to decide<br>
which paths to build.<br>
<br>
See also<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/May-2010/msg00081.html" target="_blank">http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/May-2010/msg00081.html</a><br>
<br>
</div></div><font color="#888888">--Roger<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Michael Gomboc<br><a href="http://www.viajando.at">www.viajando.at</a><br>pgp-id: 0x5D41FDF8<br>