[tor-relays] RFC: does a private exit would work?

[lists at for-privacy.net]

On Samstag, 4. März 2023 17:29:13 CET gus wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 10:28:44AM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:

> > longer:
> > An exit is sooner or later abused. A reduced exit policy does not prevent
> > that.
> > 
> > What about setup a tor exit relay with 'PublishServerDescriptor = 0' ?
> > 
> > Having an access line like for bridges would restrict the access. An
> > alternative could be a port knockig + iptables solution.
> > 
> > Objections and comments are welcome.
> 
> What's the goal? To have a private exit that only you can use?

I asked myself the same.
Maybe an anonymously paid server with wireguard is an alternative.
BuyVM or privex.io KVM, paid with Monero or Paysafecard.

Or toralf, you can use freifunk: https://hamburg.freifunk.net/

> There is this very interesting paper and project called HebTor:
> https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3372297.3417245

Thanx, I'll have to take a closer look.

-- 
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!

Debian GNU/Linux

It's free software and it gives you freedom!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 3864 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20230304/5acf04e9/attachment.sig>