100tb.com

[Mike Perry]

Thus spake Moritz Bartl (moritz at torservers.net):

> After we got Softlayer to at least add a comment to our IP range,
> surprisingly most complaints went to us directly. So far, with the
> limited exit policy, Softlayer hasn't been bothered about us. It is a
> controversial topic if and why one should willingly limit the exit
> policy, but I don't feel too bad about the current set of allowed ports
> with our nodes. After all, we at Torservers don't want to help file
> sharers, and I feel HTTP(S)/XMPP traffic is more important than traffic
> on arbitrary ports.

Just as a heads up, I went through /etc/services as well as a few
wikipedia pages of ports listings and updated the port list to include
a lot of new ports about two months back (most notable are svn, git,
and mercurial):
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment

-- 
Mike Perry
Mad Computer Scientist
fscked.org evil labs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20101128/25da2c35/attachment.pgp>