[tor-mirrors] Disk space?

[StalkR]

I noticed disk full too last week, I don't recall seeing an announcement
about it but at least
https://www.torproject.org/docs/running-a-mirror.html.en was updated to
mention "Expect space requirements of up to 50 GB" so I knew what to do.
It'd be great if future changes in expectation could be announced to the
list, as arma did last time.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:13 PM, AskApache <webmaster at askapache.com> wrote:

>  I'm good with 50GB, appreciate you guys keeping an eye on this.
>
>
> On 5/27/2015 3:37 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>  On 26 May 2015, at 21:41, goll <goll at kset.org> <goll at kset.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:47:14 +0100
> Sebastian Hahn <sebastian at torproject.org> <sebastian at torproject.org> wrote:
>
> Greetings Sebastian,
>
> Unfortunately it happened again.
>
> Current usage of dist/torbrowser directory:
>
> 4.7G	./5.0a1
> 5.6G	./4.0.8
> 6.2G	./4.5a5
> 6.4G	./4.5.1
> 6.5G	./4.5
> 30G	.
>
> Should the mirrors increase the dist volume size to more than 30G?
>
>  It seems so, according to bug 15530[0]. That’s a lot of disk space for
> everything that isn’t part of the mad rush whenever a new TB is released,
> I’m not sure what good options are atm :(
>
> I think the recommendation will be 50GB for now. Even tho I have no idea
> how many days/months/years that’ll be OK for…
>
> Cheers
> Sebastian
>
> [0]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15530
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-mirrors mailing listtor-mirrors at lists.torproject.orghttps://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-mirrors mailing list
> tor-mirrors at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-mirrors/attachments/20150528/f9ba729a/attachment.html>