Tor caters to several different audiences. For individuals that want Tor for counter-censorship rather than privacy (ex. Chinese users) single-hop circuits make a lot of sense, IMHO. It would be faster for them and place less load on the Tor network (assuming exit nodes aren't the bottleneck). Chinese users use open proxies all the time simply to get around the
great firewall, and this would allow them to use the Tor network like a
big proxy grab-bag. If they don't need privacy then making them go through extra hops seems a lose-lose for both them and us.<br><br>However, it's not all roses and sunshine. One gotcha dr|z3d brought up on irc was: "The point about single hops is that it exposing the node operator to inordinate risk of legal pressure." Another issue might be making the network appear more desirable to p2p traffic (allowing for more speed probably means more abuse in that regard). Cheers! -Damian<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Alberto M. Scattolo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thedarkfreesoul@gmail.com">thedarkfreesoul@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Prithula,<br>
<br>
I'm very new to Tor but I think this is not possible, unless you<br>
change Tor source code and force it to do it. With one-hop-circuit you<br>
would lose all anonymity. As far as I know Tor needs at least 2 hops<br>
but 3 is much better.<br>
Why do you want a single-hop circuit?<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
<br>
Alberto Maria Scattolo<br>
Google profile: <a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/thedarkfreesoul" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/profiles/thedarkfreesoul</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>