[tor-bugs] #12023 [Tor]: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy cell?
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Fri May 16 11:15:10 UTC 2014
#12023: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy
cell?
------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: tor-client
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by nickm):
Sure, I agree that if we keep the current behavior, we should change the
name to last_added_nonidle_cell or something. My question is whether a
DESTROY cell should reset the timer for closing a connection because it's
idle.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12023#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list